Maybe it's a lack of education or perhaps it shows a glimpse into one's rational of thinking, but it is disturbing to have a Councilman compare a person that wishes to breathe clean air, to one from the Nazi Party, that executes unthinkable acts of hatred upon others.
Kevin
The following week, these two letters were published in response to mine:
The first the editor titled: Don't Impose Will
In response to Kevin's letter entitled "statement was offensive", I have to wonder who may be uneducated. If Kevin was a student of history, he'd know that Nazi Germany initiated and led one of the strongest anti-smoking movements in history. To insist on a public apology from Mel Carroll for simply using the term "behavior Nazi's" is completely absurd. People that share Kevin's beliefs may not simply be "behavior Nazi's", but in lock step with beliefs that this great country country has fought against since its inception.
We dare not tread down a slippery slope that slowly gives the government more and more control over our everyday lives. What's next, a government mandate that we must drink diet drinks, for our own good? Why can't Kevin find another establishment and not impose his will on the masses.
Phil
The second was titled by the editor: How Are We Baby Boomers Still Alive?
I've been quiet and listening and enduring the past 15 years. I just want to someone to explain how we are the largest group (baby boomers) alive today. Believe or not we were put in cars with smokers, held in the hospital while our mothers smoked and while pregnant she smoked. I must say they did find nicotine in our hair, we went to groceries, courthouses and everywhere else and the workers were there will all that second-hand smoke and golly gee, we are alive and not being doctored every week for allergies as a lot of our younger citizens seem to be.
My point is (like poor councilman, Mr. Carroll) grow up people. We will die when our time comes and we can't fight life for ever. Your children like ours will be fine and if someone says a word like Nazi, grow up. Lord help us if someone says something to offend us.
You will get your wish and someday, the government will tell you what to do and you won't have to worry about second-hand smoke killing us off.
Keep our freedom as long as we can and let people decide for themselves what is best for them and their property. I can promise you we will still be alive -even with smoking- to whine about something else in a few years; fast food, colas, fat, helmets, guns, drinking, etc. See Big Brother, all kinds of bad things that someone needs to take away so I don't get sick.
Debra
The one thing I noticed about both of these letters is that both authors think I am for a smoking ban, when I make no reference to being for or against it in my original letter. However passionate their responses are, they did not get my point..
So today the paper arrives, as it does every Thursday, and there is another letter published in response to mine.
The letter is titled by the editor: Regulate Rudeness?
Kevin (July 17 letter) needs to check all his facts before writing about an individual such as Mel Carroll, longtime educator and city councilman. Carroll is no different than any of the other citizens in this country; he has the right to his opinion. It is irrelevant what the issue is.
I quit smoking in 1991 because I chose to do so. I do not enjoy the smell of smoke now, but I'm able to choose which establishments I patronize, and that's as it should be. If Kevin does not wish to smell smoke, he should not blame Mr. Carroll or any of the current business owners; instead, he should investigate his smoke-free dining/bar options and make his decisions accordingly.
Mr. Carroll has been a staunch supporter of the development of Florence and has been responsible for many progressive changes in our community. I am not exactly certain how long Kevin has lived in our community, but his comment concerning Mr. Carroll's level of education was incorrect and offensive. Mr. Carroll does not smoke, but he believes in a business owner's right to choose how he runs his establishment.
I hope Kevin thinks about it before he spouts off again about an individual in our community. My husband and I do not dine out or go to bars frequently, but when we do, we are disturbed by other people's behavior more than the smoking. Adults who cannot manage to keep their children behaving or keep their problems private are offensive to other diners: perhaps we should put a ban on public rudeness ... what do you think?
E. Paulette
Yet another response that got published that did not get my point. I wrote a response to the two previous letters and it did not get published. Here it is:
My original letter that was published in your July 17th edition made no reference to me being for or against a smoking ban.
The point I was trying to make is, instead of saying, "We need to allow local property owners to decide what type of business they have, rather than have the social elite, professional do-gooders, and what I refer to as 'behavior Nazis' decide for us how we are going to live and this is what is happening right now.", why couldn't Mr. Carroll just refer to that group of citizens as non-smokers? By mentioning a class status and referring to a group as "behavior Nazis", I feel the Florence Councilman crossed a line, as if trying to alienate a group of people. A group, that based on last weeks chatroom question that was published in this very paper, seems to be the majority.
In the responses to my original letter, Debra said that I should "grow up" and Phil asked, "Why can't Kevin find another establishment and not impose his will on the masses?". When I read or hear ignorant, judgmental statements from others in a public forum, the only will I try to impose on them is to think, before they speak. Sure, I've heard worse comments from others here in Northern Kentucky and other places I've lived, but if these statements continue to go on without someone questioning them, then will we as a community ever grow up
Kevin
Maybe the editor would have titled that one: Beating A Dead Horse. I don't feel I need to say this, but for the record, I think an individual business owner should be able to choose if they allow smoking in their establishment. I have the option of patronizing it or not.
It's true what the media was saying a while back about Kentucky. Since we moved here, I've heard and read so many derogatory comments about people based on class, race, and so on. This the same part of the country with a steeple on every corner.
I can't say I'm not guilty of this, because with all the narrow minds and ignorant statements around me for the past two years, I can't help but wonder if the "Hillbilly" stereotype will ever end.
I guess that makes me hypocrite number one.